Friday, August 7, 2020

Clash of Spears Review



A post where I tell you about a new set of rules called Clash of Spears (CoS) that I recently discovered.  I bought these rules as a PDF mostly on lark because I wanted something to read, they were on sale, and I'm always looking for rulesets to use for the Dark Ages and Lord of the Rings.  

I read the PDF, liked what I read enough that I ordered the rulebook.  Then was lucky enough to actually play it when my friend Mr. CG invited me over for a game and let me pick.  A fortunate series of events.

As you can tell by the tone, I liked these rules.  Just my opinion of course, but I am practically a genius and not to mention really good looking and very modest.  

I brought my Dark Ages miniatures, my terrain, and my Cigarbox mat.
While I love my homemade mat, it can be hard to transport sometimes.
Here we have the game in the beginning phases.
The 2 objectives to fight over are the large rocks near the middle of the table


But First: Gaming During COVID

I'm pretty happy to be getting in ANY sort of Face to Face gaming during these times of rising infections in the USA.  I need some gaming time because life can't always be about work, politics, pandemic, and house chores.  Especially house chores, I seem to have endless house chores.  I blame the children.  
The wife and I have established some ground rules for gaming.  1- I have to go to their place because she's not having anyone bring their germs into our house.  2- Mask needs to be worn all times. 3-Games need to be small affairs (not big 6 player ones). 4-When I get back the clothes go into the laundry and I go into the shower, just like I return from work.  I might have a shaggy head of hair after not getting a haircut for 4 months, but it's a clean shag.  

These little hoops are a small price to pay for some fun game time.  No problem.  


Clash of Spears Review 



I’m gonna give an overview of some of the mechanics and more importantly how it plays.  You can find some good game play videos on you tube as well.

Here is a 15 minute Vid that demonstrates a combat between two units.

Here is a long video of a game played by the two authors and they do some explaining along the way.

 

Scope

The game is a skirmish game that plays on a 4x4 and uses around 40 ish miniatures per side.  A standard game is 900 pts and the two forces that I used were 830 points and had around 36 miniatures.  The miniatures are grouped into units of 4-12.  So an army has around 4-5 units with some individual leader characters walking around looking bad ass, probably pointing a sword or raising it above his head or some such.  It plays in around 2 hours.  

The game is set in Ancients, which I don’t play because I could never understand the history and if it’s not a fight between a bunch of howling barbarian Gauls versus some silent stoic Romans then I don’t know what it is.   So I just ported it over to the Dark Ages.  Which was easy to do if you accept that a heavily armed soldier in the ancient times would be equivalent to a heavily armed soldier in the Dark Ages.   There is an official Dark Ages supplement in the works, and online they have some Dark Age beta testing army lists.   But more importantly online they have the point system so you can design your own units very easily.  In summary, it wasn't much work at all.


My Saxons stalking through the battlefield



Game Begins: Engagement Phase


I love it when games have a sort of mini game of deployment that more importantly, streamlines/ combines putting the armies on the table and the first couple of turns which are usually just moving the units to where you want them.  CoS begins with no miniatures on the table, but each unit assigned to a token and these tokens in the deployment area.  Which unit belongs to which token is a secret only you know (and how good are you at secrets?  very I hope).  Players take turns moving these tokens in an attempt to gain some advantage.  The further you move these tokens the more fatigue a unit will start with (more on fatigue later, it's an important concept).  Effectively your unit wills start the game proper around 16-20" from the enemy.  If you were clever you were able to put some units on the flank or have denied an import area from the enemy.  Then players reveal which tokenf are what units to cheers or guffaws, place leaders where they will be most effective, and the game begins. 

It's a really fun method of game set up.  Depending on your force organization you will be allowed to take some dummy tokens, to use to outwit the enemy, that simply vanish later on.  Overall it's very effective in speeding up the initial parts of the game so that when you get to the actual game play, you're executing your plan of attack versus spending a good amount of time setting up that plan.


Game Play and Core concepts


Core Concept Units: A Unit will have somewhere between 4 and 12 miniatures.  All of my units had 6-8, which seems to be the sweet spot.  Each unit has a handful of stats that you expect like melee, ranged combat, morale, armor save, etc..  and some traits that make them special.  I appreciate that the stats are all used consistently; in that a lower number stat is better and you always want to roll high (so if your combat stat is a 3+ then anything 3 or higher is a hit).  Units can move in Open order in little blobs or Close Order for better protection, like a small shield wall.  Range is measured from unit to unit which is always easier.  


Vikings coming down the side of the woods.


Game Play Activation and Reactions: Players take it in turns to be the active player.  When you're the active player you have 3 options: Spend a command point to activate a unit or character, rest a unit to reduce it's fatigue, or pass and do nothing.  A game turn is basically both players going through their activation until they're out of command points or both pass.  

During a game turn a unit/character can perform 3 actions total.  Here is the interesting bit: when you activate a unit it can do all of those 3 actions during this 1 activation (Unit does action x, then y, then z (unit moves up, unit shoots it's bows, unit moves back to safety and gives the bad guys the finger)).  Or you can activate a unit and it does 1 action and call it quits and let the other player go, then later in the turn activate the unit again (for another command point) to do it's 2 remaining actions.  

These actions are the usual stuff of move, shoot, throw something, change go into close order, attack, etc..   Characters/leaders behave the same way that units do; the only differences is that a character / leader is a unit of 1 guy and has a pool of command points attached to him. In general the leaders end up standing around right behind the lines looking impressive and getting the units to do the actual fighting for him.  Exactly how I would want to do it if I were a leader.  

However, if a unit is doing a second action, the other player gets a chance to react with one of his units.  There is a roll to do this.  It's an interruption that can take place after the first action but before the second, or after the second but before the third.  This means that even if you're not the active player you're always thinking / engaged in the game because it might be a good time to react to foil the enemy's plans.  

So: a unit can activate 1-3 times a turn and take up to 3 actions over a turn.  How you use these actions is a BIG part of the game.  Units use actions while activated but also to react, actions can also be used for a response to combat (more on that later), AND any unspent actions reduce fatigue at the end of the turn (I still haven't covered fatigue yet, I'm getting to it!)  

What this means is that during the game turn each player is constantly involved by making decisions. Not just to roll saves.  This gives you the feeling that you are always playing and not just waiting for your turn.  


Red dice mark the fatigue of the units.



Core Concept: Fatigue.   Ok, let's discuss fatigue because how you manage the fatigue of units is another key mechanism, if not the most important.  There are two things that cause defeat and kill your units; the spears of the enemy and fatigue.  

Fatigue represents hits to a units moral/stamina/motivation.  A unit can hold up to 6 fatigue (any more than that convert to wounds) and if fatigue is more than x2 the number of miniatures in the unit then the unit is removed from the table.  As fatigue adds up it inflicts negative modifiers to the unit making them harder to activate, worse as combat, etc... so even your most bad ass and blood thirsty unit can become ineffectual with a lot of fatigue on it.  

Fatigue is generated by doing actions and from fighting / getting shot at.  Let's talk about those separately:

Units get fatigue by doing actions, but the smart part is that the rates in which units get fatigue for doing anything is not the same.  That sounds like it's complicated but it actually works really smoothly in the game.  Basically units made up men in heavy armor, carrying heavy shields and scary axes will get tired  faster (generate fatigue) while running around the battlefield while units of men in nothing but tighty whiteys and carrying sling shots don;t get nearly as fatigued.  For example: a unit of skirmishey troops and a unit of heavy armored Huscarls both move for 3 actions covering the same distance; the skirmishers will accumulate no fatigue for this while the Huscarls will accumulate 2.  

Some actions always generate fatigue as well; mainly the combat ones that kill people.  Also, fatigue can be generated as the result of combat if your unit took hits / casualties from failed morale rolls. 

There is more to it than I'm saying of course.  And while it sounds little complicated and it is, the fatigue dynamics flow perfectly with the game mechanics and you get used to the concept pretty fast.  It is quite simply one of those 'elegant mechanics' that work so well.  

What the fatigue system also does is ensure that troops mostly do their roles; with light troops running around hither and thither throwing javelins while your heavy troops dutifully march slowly into place and slug it out.  And I say 'mostly' only because it's not set in stone, your heavy troops can do a sprint if they need to... probably once.  

Fatigue is removed by taking the Rest action, OR at the end of a turn any unit that did not spend 3 actions gets these left over actions converted into rest actions.  


My Saxons try to hold one of the rocky objectives while Vikings stalk the woods.
You'll have to trust me on that, it's the dark ages and everyone looks the same.



Game play: Combat: It's a game about melee combat, and CoS really has great combat system.  There are things we commonly see like the number of dice you roll is the number of guys in the unit...units with great combat skills hit easier and units in good armor have better saves.  

A unit has several options for actions for hurting the enemy; they can Attack, All Out Attack, Shoot, Throw stuff.  There is no need to go into each one, and there are modifiers of being in Close Order or Loose Order.  Combat is kept simple in that it's always one unit versus one unit; no gang ups.  

What is interesting and unique in the game is that the defender also has options.  The defender can Hold (sit there and take it), or Defend (actively defend themselves gaining the ability to cancel hits BUT this cost an action), or Counter Attack (fight back and hurt the enemy BUT this costs an action and will generate a fatigue).  Unsaved hits result in removing miniatures, and any unit that took a hit(s)  (either the attacking or defending) do a moral test with each failure earning a fatigue.  

So when you attack an enemy unit the goal is not just about removing miniatures (which is always nice) but also to inflict fatigue or to burn up the enemies actions if they do anything beside Hold.  And an Attack is just one action, so a unit can attack once, then attack again for the the second action, and even attack again for it's third (though enemy gets to react as described earlier).  Now that attacking unit itself is probably pretty blown  now burdened with fatigue, and will need to rest before becoming effective again.

Overall, Combat is more than just rolling for hits and saves, but a calculus of how far you can push a unit versus it's fatigue, according to your own plan of resource management.  Again, it just works so very well.


All that pretty terrain, and only the woods near the middle matters.
That's what happens when you play a meeting engagement.


Overall

I was REALLY impressed with these rules.  It's one of the better skirmish rules sets I have come across.  It's simple enough that you can teach it to someone whose never played it (CG picked it up pretty well and he even won the game if that means anything).  It's complex enough not get boring and it keeps you engaged throughout.  It's not a beer and pretzels game, it's like a step or two above that.  It is well written and nicely illustrated.  Another excellent feature is that you can use command points to influence rolls so if you really need that reaction or activation you can spend more resources to increase the odds.  

Just so that I don't sound overly enthusiastic here are some minor negatives:

Counter Heavy:  The game needs a lot of counters which are not my favorite thing.  Each unit and character needs to track it's fatigue 1-6, each unit and character needs to track it's actions 1-3.  Each Character needs to track it's command points 1-5.  You'll need to sometimes track if a unit is unloaded.  It's a lot a lot of counters.  I used dice to track fatigue and green, yellow, and red markers for the actions (provided in the book).  Command points were whit dice.   I'm gonna have to think of some pretty ways to do this because I don't love dice on the table.

Scenarios: The book comes with 5 scenarios which are well written but are all variations of the "meeting engagement."  Meeting engagements almost always mean fighting over the middle of the table.  I would of liked to see one or two attack and defense scenarios. 


Side Discussion /RANT
One of the scenarios is the classic meeting engagement scenario where each side must fight through the other to get off the board on the opposite side while at the same time prevent the other side from doing the same thing.  This scenario has always bothered me because it's so gamey and stupid.  I can;t think of one actual time in the history of war where this would of been the objective.  It's just some tourney scenario that just turns up over and over again.


Townspeople watch the game.  But who are they rooting for? 


My intention was just to give a brief overview of a game that I am excited about.  It's been awhile since I reviewed anything.  There's more cool stuff in these rules that I didn't touch on, but for something that I bought on an impulse I'm very pleased with my purchase.  Can't wait to play these rules again, though I will have to.  Stupid never ending house chores. 

Thanks for reading.  

30 comments:

  1. These rules sound really cool. Would love to give them a go and I love that I don’t have to own a gajillion models in order to be able to play also.

    Nice write up matey

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hey Dai! I have game, I will travel. I think you’ll like it. I’ll send you an email and we can set something up maybe. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  2. G'Day Stew, glad to see your F2F play date was successful. Your overview of the rules was very thorough and well written up. Nice figures & terrain - what more can a gamer ask for? Cheers Greg

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Greg, I guess we all could ask for a cold drink and a hot woman? Glad you liked the write up and miniatures and stuff. I don’t get my dark ages stuff out as much as I’d like. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  3. Nice report. The rules sound very solid and intuitive, I especially like the interaction with the reaction interrupt mechanic. You Saxons also look rather tasty!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Norm, I think these are well written rules. I don’t take my saxons out to play as much as I’d like. I do enjoy the dark ages genre. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  4. Stew, your travel setup looks super! You have a very fine collection. I enjoyed your review as you laid out both the pros and cons. Looks like for your skirmish gaming, this one has lots of potential. Finally, great to see a return to F2F gaming for you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks JF! It’s nice when you find a set of rules that checks most of your boxes. I don’t really know why, but I’ve never really found a ‘go to’ rule set for the dark ages. I just keep buying rules and trying them out. This one does have a lot of potential for me, just need to play it a few more times to really see.
      Course that’s always the hard part in these times. This was only my second game since all this COVID started. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  5. Look like a great game, and the rules seem interesting too.

    How are horses (and chariots) handled? Seems like they would allow for the heavy armored guys to take all those actions with little to no fatigue... which is how it should be, walking is for peons.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Laz! Horses have a higher movement and some other bonuses; so you get fatigue in the same way but are going twice as fast. I also like that a mounted miniature is treated as a whole so don’t have to worry about if you hit the man or the horse.

      I must confess that I did not read the section that addressed chariots because I don’t have any and never plan to have any. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  6. The pictures of the game look great and this ruleset does sound up my historical alley. I wish the model count were a bit lower as that would take me a long time to paint up in the slow way that I usually go about it. Regardless, I will keep an eye on this ruleset for when I have a need to paint some Roman stuff which one day I will finally give in to :) Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this game and I hope you'll regale us with some battle reports in the future!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Kuribo. You of course could play with a smaller point value to decrease the miniature needed. And just to temp you; I think Victorix miniatures (which everyone says are outstanding miniatures) have box sets for CoS. I bet you would really enjoy painting up some Romans. Plenty of details to fuss over. πŸ˜€
      The game is more complex than LoTR but I think that is a good thing. Also, I prefer rules that used units versus man to man.

      Delete
    2. If you get a commission then you may earn a cut soon because that sounds pretty enticing :) I will dig into this further!

      Delete
    3. Lol, a common hazard to reading blogs. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  7. Followed their kickstarter, and then had to drop out. Picked up the pdf, and read it, but haven't had a trial game yet. Now you've got the gears turning . . .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your welcome Markus. If you try it out, I’d be interested in what you think. I obviously was very impressed with the mechanics. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  8. Looking good, Stew! Always great to have a set of rules that you really enjoy. I'm in a similar boat to you in that I'm only allowed 1 person face to face games but they've all been here at my house. Any gaming is good gaming!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks DG. Yeah, it’s fun to find an enjoy a new set of rules.
      Lucky you that you can play at home! I have to wait around till I get invited to someone’s place. Of course, I occasionally drop hints with emails or texts that I’m available. Only once per day. And while I do miss the group game, the 1 vs 1 games are great and anything larger just seems foolish in these pandemic times. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  9. Nice AAR. Thank you for sharing. Looks like a good set of rules.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks John. I appreciate you reading the post and leaving the comment. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  10. Great review Stew. Sure I've got these rules hidden away somewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ray! I know that feeling. I was actually going through my rules collection the other day and found two I didn’t even know I had. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  11. Great looking game Stew and a wonderful review of a set of rules I had not heard of surprisingly. Your table and figures really do look quite enticing by the way.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Carlo! The rules are recently written so it no surprise that they are not well known yet. Course now they’ll have a big sales bump from my HUGELY successful blog...πŸ™„
      Glad you like my dark ages stuff. It’s one my first collections.

      Delete
  12. Nice review: sounds a bit like "Naked Saga" (a version of Saga where you don't use the specials but just the bits at the top of the battle boards). Love the look of your game!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Ed. I hoping to get in more dark ages games with the rules. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  13. Lovely to see your dark age troops and terrain! Sounds like an interesting set of rules and very fair review, maybe I'll think about it after Dux Bellorum, maybe you could use the scenarios from that set?
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Iain. That’s a good idea about the scenarios, and now that I’m thinking on it, dux Brit could also be a possible source of information. πŸ˜€

      Delete
  14. This is a fantastic review... I showed it to Alvaro today and could not believe how you hit on every point that we wanted to get across in the rules...

    The review is so clear and informative and so well laid out.

    And it is true about being counter heavy.. we removed as much as we could but we really felt we needed to keep the ones that stayed.. we did a lot of work, for example reworking all the probabilities with montecarlo simulation to fit the morale effects so that your fatigue would never go above 6 so that there is no long trail of red chips following the units.. BUT yes.. we have counters.. will be nice to see if you come up with something.. for characters you could have character cards on the side...

    One thing to mention is that we don't have a scenario were you exit on the opponents table edge, the pre battle scouting represents observing the enemy deployment and coming back to report like before the big battles in the punic wars so it is not gamey like the other one because you can kill the unit that scouted.. I actually like that scenario very much personally..

    And I promise the attack defense scenarios are coming ( one is already on our expansion Fields of Blood ), we just wanted to have the encounter ones in the first book and leave the attack defense for the next book... In Fields of Blood you even have assault rules and an assault scenario..

    I love that you did your lists for Dark Ages, our expansion is coming but we didn't want people to have to wait so we were very specific with the points and design system so that people could come up with their lists in the meantime..

    Thank you for such a wonderful review.. I hope you'll stop by our FB page, The Wargame Spot...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hello!

      I’m very glad you found this review and took the time to leave such a nice reply. Clash of Spears is a great set of rules and should bring you fame and fortune and groupies.

      I did get the scenario wrong, and that is embarrassing. I failed my reading comprehension test. I’ll have to edit my text.

      It was very easy to create some dark ages army lists using the point system. But I’ll definitely be purchasing the future supplements.

      Congratulations on creating a wonderful product. πŸ˜€

      Delete