Tuesday, May 16, 2023

Starmada Unity Star Trek TNG ship builds

 

Hello faceless space fans!  In this post I share all the ship builds I did for gaming Star Trek TNG using the Starmada Unity system.  Federation and Klingon, and there are quite a lot of them.  It's a monster post.


But First Back on Earth:


This Terrible blog is lucky enough to have some folks who routinely / foolishly read and comment on many posts that I write.  Thank you.  However, this post has a much more narrow focus and target audience that's best illustrated by this compelling Venn Diagram...


If you don't find yourself on this diagram then you can feel free to to skip this post.  I won't hold it against it you.  There's nothing here that will really interest you.  So don't worry about it.

I mean I read ALL your dumb posts about Napoleonic wargames but you know, it's cool and whatever.  

Now we leave earthly concerns behind and get back to space.  Where the real action is. 


Starmanda Unity Star Trek 


When I wanted to start gaming some Star Trek star ship space combat I found some sites on the internet that helped guide the way.  This is meant to be one of those sign posts in the internet to help guide others in the same direction.  To give a starting off point.  It should not be taken as cannon and I should not be mistaken for someone who knows what he is doing.  It's just meant to be helpful.  If you like, you can click the 'Star Trek' label over on the right (if your seeing the webpage version) to see more Star trek posts on how I got here.  Ok, fine, you can just click HERE.  

Designing Star Trek Ships was something of a laborious process.  First I went to several websites to get the specs on these fictional ships most which vary slightly.  Then I had to come up with a clever formula to convert things from universe terms to game stats; for example if a ship had  16 phaser banks then how many phasers should it have in the game?  THEN I went along and categorized every type of warp engine and shield generator to cross reference the power output across different hulls and I"M JUST KIDDING I DID NONE OF THAT. 

What I did do was start with a medium ship and designed that till it 'looked right' and did my best to scale up or down from there depending if the next ship was larger or smaller / more powerful or less powerful / a personal favorite or fleet filler.  Something of an Endless Tinkering but not hard (especially with the dry dock spreadsheet) and in this way whole fleets started to take shape.  


General Guiding  Principles


All ships like to shoot straight ahead, but the Klingons doubled down on that principle.  

Klingon ships are faster and more maneuverable than Federation ships (Klingons have a higher engine) because of above.

All Ships have some Screens that I call 'plot armor.'  This is to represent that the first couple of times a ship gets hit you see the crew stumble around, a panel bursts into sparks, someone says "damage report!" and someone else says "damage to decks 3, 5, and 12 and shields weakening"   but the ship is totally fine and working 100%.  Some ships have more 'plot' than others, probably because they have a sex-ay main character or something. 

I use the optional rules Free Form Turns and Graded Turns.  A ship must move 2 hexes forward between turns (a side slip counts as going forward but after a side slip a ship must move forward) and some ships have tight turns and wide turns abilities.  Small ships also have the Evasive optional rule which I paired down to "-2 to hit/be hit for double the Engine requirement."  

I picture Star Trek kind like Sailing ships of the line (but in Spaaaaaaace) which is cool because the TV show was kinda like Hornblower (but in SPAAAAACE).  So just like the sailing navy and the rating system, Star Ship ship classes across the fleets have their rough equivalents in the enemy.  More on this later.  

These ships are designed that a player would control 6-8 ships in mind.  

There's more to say but one can ramble on.  Everything else is mostly about preferences.  Preferences that are mine and maybe not yours.  that's one of the strengths of the rule set is that there are several dials that can be turned wherever one likes.    For example: I tend to like the simplicity of shields being a protective egg of constant strength around a ship.  It makes the game play faster because when Directional Shields are used then you have to worry about defensive arcs and then players always want to reinforce shields and etc..  

Now lets present the ships from smallest to biggest.

 

FEDERATION OF PLANETS


My complete Federation fleet.
Known as The Grey Menance.
All saucer and rocket thingys.



SABER CLASS

The Saber class is the Federation escort ship.  It's fast, it's maneuverable, and has a smattering of phasers.  But it won't give any ship bigger than it any worries.


DEFIANT CLASS


The Defiant class is technically an escort ship, but it's super up-gunned and up-powered.  That's because it's the hero ship in the DS9 series so it's gotta be cool. It's a tough little ship with lots of guns; when the players realize that the phaser cannons shoot with 3 dice each (because that's what it did on the show) the Federation players smile and the Klingon players say "that ship's gotta go."  



EXCELSIOR CLASS



The Excelsior is the Federation's medium sized ubiquitous work horse.  It's the upgraded version of the Constitution class (the Enterprise in The Original Series was a Constitution class).   Any Federation fleet is gonna have a couple.


AMBASSADOR CLASS

The Ambassador fills the role of the large ship in the Federation fleet.  I actually don't think you see a lot of Ambassadors class ships in the TV series but the concept of there being a ship class in-between the Excelsior and the Galaxy is good for game play.  Plus I just think it looks cool.  


AKIRA CLASS

The Akira is another large ship like the Ambassador class but more modern.  It's faster and basically a torpedo ship.  


GALAXY CLASS


The Galaxy is a capital ship.  It's also my favorite and we already know everything there is to know about it from many episodes of The Next Generation.  I tried to design it as dangerous and tough as it would go out and explore all by itself but not really a full battleship.  


SOVEREIGN CLASS

When the Federation finally got around to making a capital war ship; the Sovereign is the result.  It's got a ton of guns, even more deadly torpedoes, it's fast, and got strong shields.  It's a super-duper-uber ship.  But at a TON of points and the hero ship from the movies so it's a got a lot of space to fill.  




THE KLINGON EMPIRE

My complete Klingon Fleet.
Christmas Trees of Death.




KVORT CLASS (Bird of Prey)

The Kvort is really just a small gunship / raiding vessel.  It's a very iconic Klingon ship so the temptation is there to make it really dangerous but it's just a small thing after all.  




MAKESH CLASS

This is the medium sized Klingon battle cruiser.  I figured that if the Federation replaced the Constitution class with the Excelsior class then the Klingons probably replaced the D7 with something.  They didn't, and I have talked long and eloquently in previous posts about how I dislike the overall look of the D7 so replaced it with this model from Star Trek Renegades.  




VORCHA CLASS


The Large Klingon ship is the Vorcha and it's the fleet's mainstay.  Besides the Bird of Prey this is the type of ship seen most in the TV series.  I love the look of the ship, kinda like an angry crab.  It's got a nice mix of weapons but like all the Klingon ships so far it can't shot behind it.   


VORCHA TORPEDO MODULE


This is just the Vorcha chassis with a head module outfitted for Torpedoes, essentially it changes out the heavy disrupters for extra torpedo launchers and gains a cool looking hammer head shark look that makes all the Klingon ladies growl.  



NEGVHAR CLASS

The Klingon capital ship and big ol' battleship.  While other Klingon Ships are sleek, fast, and maneuverable, when they designed this one they thought "screw all that showing who the best warriors are by using skill and tactics, let's just make a big, slow moving, hard thing."   It's not very fast and can't turn very well but can take a lot of punishment and dish it out too.



NORGH CLASS

The Norgh class is another capital ship. This ship is not in the TV or movies but it's a cool Klingon-ish model and for game play the Klingons needed something approximating the Federation Sovereign class. So it's a Made-Up Made-UP ship.  Aren't they all.




An Exciting Discussion on Cloaking Devices


And other fun stuff: As I mentioned way before, I wanted the fleets to basically have rough equivalencies between them.  For example a Klingon large ship is about the same points as a Federation large ship:  a Klingon Vorcha class at 300 points is about the same as a Federation Ambassador class at 330. 

You will see that across the fleets most of the ships in a given size are roughly within 30 points of each other.  You will also see that every Klingon ship has a cloaking device because they all have it on the TV show and cloaking devices are part of the Klingon "Klingon-ness" and are just fun.  However, none of the Klingon ships actually paid the points for having a cloaking device because cloaking devices are SUPER DAMN EXPENSIVE.  CDs should be expensive because they are powerful.  If included in the point cost each Klingon ship would be really expensive and therefore hard to balance for game play.  So instead I hit upon this clever strategy that I will share with you now.  because it's a blog and it's all about sharing.  And telling me how clever I am in the comments.

First off, the Klingon ships pay for a tractor beam which I just renamed a cloaking device in the SSD so that the loss limits come out right.  Second, I introduce a rule that Klingons CANNOT cloak all their ships at the same time, but can ONLY have a certain number cloaked at once.  I say to players this is because Klingon battle doctrine is not about all the ships being cloaked and doing a mass ambush out of nowhere to an unsuspecting enemy nor is space combat about a big game of hide and go seek; those are things that Romulans would do.  Everyone hates the Romulans.  

Klingon doctrine dictates that honorable combat means that there's always uncloaked ships and its a matter of shifting targets / out smarting the enemy so that the enemy always knows it's under attack but does not know what to do because Klingons are better at combat.  I made all that up but it sounds very Klingon right? 

I usually set the limit of cloaked ships to be 1/4 of the total Klingon ships in a force.  In effect this means that every Klingon ship CAN cloak but they all can't.  And the player has to decide how to use that, has to think it through for the best advantage, like a WARRIOR.

However Klingons still have to pay some points from somewhere for the CDs or it gets unfair really fast.  To make up the cost I have the Klingon side reduce their fleet total by 100 points or 5% (whichever is higher) for each ship that is able to be cloaked at any given time.  example: if playing an even match game of 2000 points then the Feds get 2000 and the Klingons get 1600 and they can cloak up to 4 ships at once.  it helps that most Klingon ships are a little cheaper than their Federation counterparts so maybe they can squeeze in an extra ship.  In any game where the points are uneven (because one side is attacking or whatever) make the Klingons the aggressor, it fits their personality.


Or if all that becomes a pain or I don't want cloaking devices I can just use the points as is.  



Experimental Victory points:

 
One more thing before I go.  Obviously I really like the Starmada rules though there is one little weakness I have discovered over playing the game a half dozen times: small ships and victory points. 
In the scenarios presented in the rule book, victory is determined by the point value of ships destroyed, like victory when one side scores 600 points.  This means that large ships are really motivated to attack small ships because they are easy victory points; A 555 point Galaxy class can easily take out a 95 point Kvort.  

The small ship is helped by having the Evasive rule, but it creates situations where large ships go hunting for smaller ones which does NOT match my Ships of the Line (in SPAAAAAACE); because in the age of sail, Ships of the Line would not worry about enemy frigates in a battle unless they got annoying.

To fix this I hit upon this clever idea which I will now share with you, because it's a blog and it's all about sharing. That and hearing about how clever I am in the comments.  (Does it sound like an echo in here?  I feel like I am repeating myself).

Instead of using the actual point values of the ships; I assign each ship class to be worth a number of victory points that is roughly related to it's actual point value.  And then the victory condition is some fraction of the total for the whole fleet, like half or so.  These values are:

Saber and Kvort - 0pts
Defiant, Excelsior, and Makesh - 2pts
Ambassador, Akira, Vorcha - 4 points
Galaxy, Neghvar, Korgh - 8 pts
Sovereign - 10 pts.


So lets say a Federation fleet is composed of 1 Saber, 1 Defiant, 2 Excelsior, 2 Akira, and 1 Galaxy which makes the fleet a total of  22 victory points.  The Klingons would score a win if they destroyed (lets say) 12 points worth.  

Since the Saber is worth 0 victory points,  Any shots fired at it are kinda a waste, so the Saber is free to fly around all super fast and try to be annoying.  However, if it's too annoying (that Saber has hit twice with it's proton torpedo, it's gots to go!) or maybe is getting close to completing some other objective; it's still gonna find itself at the center of attention.  It creates a nice dynamic.  When a small ship looses half it's hull or one complete damage track it will warp away.  

Also, if the Galaxy gets blown up that's like 3/4 of the victory points right there, and that just feels right.  Because that was the Enterprise  BLOWN UP!  


Again.


Plot Course for Away from Here. Anywhere.


And there, my internet friends, is how I have tweaked the Starmada system to Star Trek, and my fabulous ship builds that impress all the SevenOfNine types and makes them want to assimilate me. There are worse fates.




and so it is.
Thanks for reading.
Double thanks for leaving a comment.
Triple thanks for writing a comment even if you have no interest in Star Trek or Starmada but that must mean you are also a SUPER NERD!

37 comments:

  1. I may not be in either of those circles, but still find myself in that Super Nerd category. Nice post! Even if I barely understood a lot of it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol. Thanks Space. We super nerds have to stick together. 😀

      Delete
  2. Venn diagrams! I love Venn diagrams! Paraphrasing a current VP...
    Where is the circle that simply enjoys your posts no matter the topic? Hmm?

    Fab looking fleets.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jonathan. I should of known that someone who likes to crunch data and make charts would love a Venn.

      Unfortunately, the circle you describe does not exist. 😀

      Delete
  3. Stew, you now seem to have too much free time on your hands, you need to get involved in another napoleonic campaign to stop that :-)

    I’m always pleased when a ‘thing’ from my youth makes it through to modern time and is still cool, who would have thought that Lego would still be the number one selling brand. The above shows just how much the original Star Trek got right on the aesthetics of ship build, the physics / engineering side and the general universe narrative sub-plot.

    I know it is extra work, but I quite like the idea of directional attacks / shields (probably from my Battletech influences) and it seems that it would be this that would make the cloaking device more relevant anyway, to set up directional attacks - though I suppose the ability to transfer shields does undermine that a little …… though not of itself ‘illogical’ :-)

    Vessels look really good - like they have been hanging around in space for some time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol. Thanks Norm. As I’ve mentioned in previous posts, the ST genre is also from my youth (though the TNG version) and it’s all been something of a nostalgia project for me as well.

      I do have versions of the ships with directional shields. It doesn’t add that much more complexity really; though probably a feature best used with veteran players.

      I really enjoyed playing in your online campaign tremendously. I’d do it again in a heartbeat. Also gave me ideas to run my own one day. 😀

      Delete
  4. I still think you need to do Romulans.....
    I agree you have too much time on your hands and need to do (yawn) a Nappy campaign....
    You have too much time on your hands and should play with your kids more.......
    Anyone who uses Venn diagrams is a nerd........everybody else gave up on Venn diagrams....
    Paint Romulans.....
    Play with your kids.....
    Neil ☺

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Neil is a fellow who is wise. I agree with his suggestion to "do Romulans" wholeheartedly.

      Delete
    2. Lol. I don’t think y’all like Romulans so much as you like busting my chops about them. 😀

      When did everyone give up Venn diagrams? I missed the memo. And I play with my kids plenty already. If anything too much. Sooner they learn that one is utterly alone in life the less of a shock it’ll be. 😀

      Delete
  5. You have done lots of background work on your nice looking fleets and thinking about the victory points. You will be well prepared for your games.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Peter. Well prepared games are fun games. 😀

      Delete
  6. So much to comment on. Awesome ships, beautifully painted, tick. Extremely amusing commentary as expected, tick. Gratuitous picture of that space minx Seven of Nine, tick tick. It was all going so well and then you went and mentioned PROTON torpedo’s (ahem…Star Wars?) sigh. On behalf of all the other super nerds I demand you get out of that central venn diagram space right now mister. Lol.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol thanks Mark. Aghast, I went through my post looking for proton and I don’t see it anywhere. You’ll have to trust me I didn’t edit it out. So I think I’m safe in the Super Cool nerd circle. 😀

      Delete
  7. Well that was well thought out and very inciteful, almost like being in a lecture about the Klingons and the Federation at Starfleet Academy ! LOL All the detail and added rules make perfect sense, and sound like they will provide a very balanced game, if the scenario calls for that. Look forward to reading a battle report from this sometime soon, or maybe a battle of both fleets defending against a Borg cube, although you might need some more ships before playing that out ! LOL

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dave. Your observation about feeling like a lecture confirms me as super cool nerd. 😀
      Think I’ll skip on the borg though for now. A cube would be like a foot and a half on each side at this scale. Though I would like to get a space station eventually.

      Delete
  8. Liking the logic used to make your ship's rules choices. Now you need to work on making up rules for the Romulan fleet that you know you really need to add to your collection!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Dai. I’ll admit that the Romulans have some cool looking ships. Though their basic ship the Ddederix is a really big ship and probably would not be substantially different than some super Klingon one. But I guess that means I’d only need a few…😀

      Delete
    2. Super big! When I was researching what the Romulan fleet actually used in the shows, there was limited info and that their "Warbird" (The one you correctly name above) was enormous in the TNG/DS9 era! Would make for starting a fleet of them very simple though like you say. Am very tempted to get one or two off of thingieverse or Etsy (Price dependant) just to paint up...

      Delete
    3. Yeah, I think I’d be as out 6” long and around 5” wide at my scale of 1/7000 (basically twice the size of the Galaxy class).
      On Etsy, I was looking at Robsmodelshop (or some such) that has ST ships that appear to be the right scale.

      Delete
  9. The ships, stat sheets and backstories are all terrific Stew. As I paint my way through some WWII ships I can see certain comparisons and the attraction of this for gaming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Lawrence. Space and naval combat have a lot of similarities in miniature games I think.
      The guy who wrote Starmada also wrote a battleship/ naval game called Grand Fleets. I keep it in mind bc II know that one day I’ll likely do WWII naval. 😀

      Delete
  10. Great stuff! You know I am also in the center of that Venn diagram.

    If you wanted to keep on designing ships, and did NOT want to do Romulans, well I would not complain if you did the Cardassians (Hideki, Galor, Keldon) and other Fed ships from the era (Miranda, Oberth, Constellation, Cheyanne, New Orleans, Nebula [why do the Feds get so many darn ships? Oh right, stars of the shows]). No cloaking devices to worry about there!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks David. We are in good company. 😀
      Yes, the Cards and the Jemhadar are where I am leaning towards going next. And of course getting a DS9 to fight over.
      And of course some of those other Federation types.

      Delete
  11. Sadly I Don’t find myself on the diagram but the ships do look nice in the pictures 🙂

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lol. Thanks Matt. I appreciate you stopping by all the same. 😀

      Delete
  12. Stew you are so super clever with your ships. You spelt Sovereign wrong on the ship card 🤣
    Should there be a set of boxes to tick off as the "red shirts" get killed when a hit is saved. Or are these the Marines?

    Great post as always.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dammit! Where is my editor?!
      Red shirts only get killed on away missions. On the ship they are safe. 😀

      Delete
  13. I read all the post and comments and I agree you should paint Romans or Romulans or Kardashians or somebody else, because of you I watched 10 minutes of Picard, I gave up because Romulans have Irish accent apparently!
    Best Iain

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. O no Iain! If I had known you were going to start watching, I would have urged you to bypass the first two seasons of Picard altogether! Truly awful and a stark contrast to the perfection that is the third and final season! Honestly, just watch the third season, you won't be dissapointed.

      Delete
    2. Well that’s 10 more minutes of Picard that I have seen. 😀
      I would probably watch it but I don’t have the right streaming service and I’ll be Damned before I get another one. I already have Prime, Netflix, and Disney.
      On Disney there is ‘The Orroville’ which I think is good, and kinda comedy drama parody of Star Trek.

      Delete
  14. There was at one point a series of online games where players roleplayed as admirals, selecting a period Star Trek fleet and trying to defend/explore a sector of space. I was never much for the active fighting side of things, but I've always been interested in ship stats. Maybe because I liked the concept of Voyager, if not the execution, and liked to imagine how it would have gone with a different ship class or in a different era. That means the stats I look for are speed, internal layout, crew size (and composition, which is rarely detailed) and number of small craft. I've never felt Star Trek, as a genre, laid enough emphasis on how battles were fought to actually be playable as a battle game, but I understand the popularity of the FASA wargame.

    I've just started watching Babylon 5 - quite good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Jennifer you’re right that the Star Trek universe is not super well flushed out or consistent. The rules I’m using are universal (which just means generic) so the only thing about them that makes it Star Trek ish is that I’m using those ships and I label weapons as phasers. But the rules themselves are very consistent so I was able to impose some order on the fleets.

      I’ve been watching/reading the series The Expanse.” Now that is something super consistent. 😀

      Delete
  15. I guess I’m a denizen of the middle section too even though I'm not a trekkie (used to love the original series when I was a kid though). Those ships are beautifully painted, especially the Klingons. Have to second Iain - would love to see you paint the Kardashians.

    Is that chewing gum stuck around the lady’s left eye?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Mike. We’re in good company. 😀
      The ships did turn out pretty nifty even with my mediocre paintings skills.

      Delete
  16. This looks like a very handy article and it was impeccably written (as always!). I would like to see a new chart made because I don't fit onto that Venn diagram and I don't know the first thing about Napoleonics either but that doesn't stop me from turning up and commenting regularly! :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. lol. Thanks Jeff. I don’t know the first thing about painting well but that doesn’t stop me from commenting on your posts. 😀

      Delete
  17. As always a fun post to read Stew! I like the way you tweaked things to 'prevent' players from gaining easy points shooting at the small ships and to make them focus their fire on the bigger ones. Maybe some escort scenarios could be fun too, making sure those important minerals, supplies or whatever get through. Keep up the good work!

    ReplyDelete